Influence of the birthing room design on midwives' job satisfaction - A cross-sectional online survey embedded in the 'Be-Up' study.

BACKGROUND: Job satisfaction is an important factor influencing work performance, personal well-being, commitment and retention. The working environment influences job satisfaction. The design of the birthing room could influence the practice of midwives and their satisfaction. This study investigates whether the alternative design of the birthing room implemented in the randomized controlled trial 'Be-Up' (Birth environment-Upright position) has an impact on job satisfaction of midwives. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire with 50 items addressing job satisfaction and birth room design was performed. The sample (n = 312) consists of midwives whose obstetric units participated in the Be-Up study and, as comparison group, midwives working in non-study obstetric units. These two independent groups were compared using t-tests; correlations and impacts were examined. RESULTS: The results of the T-tests revealed statistically significant higher global job satisfaction and higher satisfaction with team support of midwives in the Be-Up room. However, midwives working in customary birthing rooms were more satisfied with the design of the room. The most important predictors of job satisfaction were team factors and understaffing in both groups. CONCLUSION: Reasons for diminished satisfaction with the working environment in the Be-Up study may be assumed in uncertainties about emergency management in a new and unfamiliar environment. Furthermore the impact of a single redesigned room within a customary obstetric unit on job satisfaction seems small, as the room is embedded in the ward and hospital environment. More comprehensive concepts on the potential of the work environment influencing midwives' job satisfaction are needed.

Measuring job satisfaction of midwives: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Given the global shortage of midwives, it is of utmost interest to improve midwives' job satisfaction and working environments. Precise measurement tools are needed to identify both predictors of job satisfaction and intervention strategies which could increase it. The aim of this study is to collate, describe and analyse instruments used in research to assess the job satisfaction of midwives working in hospitals, to identify valid and reliable tools and to make recommendations for the further development of specific instruments for midwifery practice and future midwifery research. METHODS: We conducted systematic literature searches of the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database. Studies which assessed the job satisfaction of midwives working in a hospital setting were eligible for inclusion. FINDINGS: Out of 637 records 36 empirical research articles were analysed, 27 of them cross-sectional studies. The studies had been conducted in 23 different countries, with sample sizes ranging between nine and 5.446 participants. Over 30 different instruments were used to measure midwives' job satisfaction, with considerable differences in terms of domains evaluated and number of items. Twelve domains relevant for job satisfaction of midwives working in hospitals were identified from the empirical studies. Four instruments met the defined reliability and validity criteria. CONCLUSION: Autonomy, the significance of the job, the challenges of balancing work and private life, and the high emotional and physical demands of midwifery are job characteristics which are underrepresented in instruments measuring job satisfaction. The influence of the physical working environment has also not yet been researched. There is a need to develop or adapt instruments to the working environment of midwives.

[Health Literacy Among German Health Professionals-To-Be - Exploratory Pilot Study]. / Die Gesundheitskompetenz von angehenden Ärzt*innen Pflegenden, Hebammen, Therapeut*innen und Gesundheitsmanager*innen in Deutschland ­ Explorative Pilotstudie.

OBJECTIVE: Health literacy is defined as the ability to collect, understand, evaluate and use health information. Previous studies have shown that the German population has only an average level of health literacy. Health professionals such as nurses, doctors or midwives need to be health literate themselves to promote patients' health literacy, as well as to protect and promote their own health. So far, there is a lack of research about health literacy among health professionals in Germany. The objective of this study was to assess the health literacy of health professionals. METHOD: The study involved 583 participants from the final year classes of the DHBW Stuttgart and dual cooperation partners (vocational schools and academic teaching hospitals). These included graduates of nursing, midwifery and therapy (physiotherapy/logo-/occupational therapy), as well as management in health care and medical students in their practical year. The questionnaire HLS-EU-Q16 was used to record health literacy. By means of 16 questions, the participants rated on a 4-point scale how easy or difficult it was for them to find, understand, assess and implement health-related information. RESULTS: The study showed that only 30.1% of the participants had sufficient health literacy; 48.9% of the participants showed problematic health literacy, 21.0% inadequate health literacy. The analysis of the individual questions showed that, in almost all areas, paticipants reported more problems in finding, understanding, assessing and implementing health-related information than respondents in other European countries. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that young health professionals have limited health literacy. Further research is needed to obtain a more comprehensive and differentiated picture of health literacy among health professionals. Health literacy skills and competencies should be systematically introduced in health professions-related study curricula, as well as in bedside training.

Usability of electronic patient record systems: Instrument validation study conducted for hospitals in Germany.

In Germany and elsewhere, few hospital electronic patient record usability surveys are available. Moreover, there seems to be a complete lack of validated instruments in the respective literature. Hence, this study's purpose is to validate a scale for measuring the usability of hospital electronic patient record systems. The data used for the study's analyses (n = 949) were originally obtained during the German national initiative 'Hospital IT User Questionnaire'. In the course of the study, reliability and exploratory factor analyses were conducted and psychometric tests showed a reliable, valid and suitable instrument. Descriptive data analysis suggests a generally low user perception and variances hint at a high potential for future improvements. To our knowledge, this study shows that a general inventory (subscales from the IsoMetrics inventory) can be applied to measuring hospital electronic patient record usability as well. The validated instrument can be used to inform healthcare providers, decision makers and politicians of a given state of usability, discrepancies between different hospitals or systems providers, and serve as a basis for improvements.

Virtual patients in continuing medical education and residency training: a pilot project for acceptance analysis in the framework of a residency revision course in pediatrics.

AIM: Virtual patients (VPs) are a one-of-a-kind e-learning resource, fostering clinical reasoning skills through clinical case examples. The combination with face-to-face teaching is important for their successful integration, which is referred to as "blended learning". So far little is known about the use of VPs in the field of continuing medical education and residency training. The pilot study presented here inquired the application of VPs in the framework of a pediatric residency revision course. METHODS: Around 200 participants of a pediatric nephology lecture ('nephrotic and nephritic syndrome in children') were offered two VPs as a wrap-up session at the revision course of the German Society for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ) 2009 in Heidelberg, Germany. Using a web-based survey form, different aspects were evaluated concerning the learning experiences with VPs, the combination with the lecture, and the use of VPs for residency training in general. RESULTS: N=40 evaluable survey forms were returned (approximately 21%). The return rate was impaired by a technical problem with the local Wi-Fi firewall. The participants perceived the work-up of the VPs as a worthwhile learning experience, with proper preparation for diagnosing and treating real patients with similar complaints. Case presentations, interactivity, and locally and timely independent repetitive practices were, in particular, pointed out. On being asked about the use of VPs in general for residency training, there was a distinct demand for more such offers. CONCLUSION: VPs may reasonably complement existing learning activities in residency training.

German adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II: study protocol of a single-centred, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Caring for a family member with dementia is extremely stressful, and contributes to psychiatric and physical illness among caregivers. Therefore, a comprehensive programme called Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II (REACH II) was developed in the United States to enhance the health of Alzheimer's caregivers. REACH II causes a clear reduction of the stress and burdens faced by informal caregivers at home. The aim of this protocol is to adapt, apply, and evaluate this proven intervention programme in a German-speaking area for the first time. This newly adapted intervention is called Deutsche Adaption der Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (DeREACH). METHODS: A total of 138 informal caregivers at home are recruited in a single-centred, randomised controlled trial. The intervention (DeREACH) consists of nine home visits and three telephone contacts over six months, all of which focus on safety, psychological well-being and self-care, social support, problem behaviour and preventive health-related behaviours. A complex intervention assessment on effectiveness will be adopted when the primary outcome - namely, the reduction of caregiver burden - and other secondary outcomes, including changes with regard to anxiety and depression, somatisation, health-related quality of life, and perceived social support, are measured at baseline, as well as immediately and three months after the intervention. The change from baseline to post-intervention assessment with regard to the primary outcome will be compared between treatment and control group using t-tests for independent samples. DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that this study will show that DeREACH effectively reduces caregiver burden and therefore works under the conditions of a local German health-care system. If successful, this programme will provide an effective intervention programme in the German-speaking area to identify and develop the personal capabilities of informal caregivers to cope with the burdens of caring for people with dementia.

An innovative blended learning approach using virtual patients as preparation for skills laboratory training: perceptions of students and tutors.

BACKGROUND: Currently only a few reports exist on how to prepare medical students for skills laboratory training. We investigated how students and tutors perceive a blended learning approach using virtual patients (VPs) as preparation for skills training. METHODS: Fifth-year medical students (N=617) were invited to voluntarily participate in a paediatric skills laboratory with four specially designed VPs as preparation. The cases focused on procedures in the laboratory using interactive questions, static and interactive images, and video clips. All students were asked to assess the VP design. After participating in the skills laboratory 310 of the 617 students were additionally asked to assess the blended learning approach through established questionnaires. Tutors' perceptions (N=9) were assessed by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: From the 617 students 1,459 VP design questionnaires were returned (59.1%). Of the 310 students 213 chose to participate in the skills laboratory; 179 blended learning questionnaires were returned (84.0%). Students provided high overall acceptance ratings of the VP design and blended learning approach. By using VPs as preparation, skills laboratory time was felt to be used more effectively. Tutors perceived students as being well prepared for the skills laboratory with efficient uses of time. CONCLUSION: The overall acceptance of the blended learning approach was high among students and tutors. VPs proved to be a convenient cognitive preparation tool for skills training.

Patterns of care and course of symptoms in palliative radiotherapy: a multicenter pilot study analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate patterns of care as well as effectiveness and side effects of palliative treatment in four German radiation oncology departments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All referrals in four German radiation oncology departments (two university hospitals, one academic hospital, one private practice) were prospective documented for 1 month in 2008 (2 months at one of the university hospitals). In palliatively irradiated patients, treatment aims and indications as well as treated sites and fractionation schedules were recorded. In addition, symptoms and side effects were analyzed with standardized questionnaires before and at the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS: During the observation period, 603 patients underwent radiation therapy in the four centers and 153 (24%, study population) were treated with palliative intent. Within the study, patients were most frequently treated for bone (34%) or brain (27%) metastases. 62 patients reported severe or very severe pain, 12 patients reported severe or very severe dyspnea, 27 patients reported neurological deficits or signs of cranial pressure, and 43 patients reported a poor or very poor sense of well-being. The most frequent goals were symptom relief (53%) or prevention of symptoms (46%). Life prolongation was intended in 37% of cases. A wide range of fractionation schedules was applied with total doses ranging from 3-61.2 Gy. Of the patients, 73% received a slightly hypofractionated treatment schedule with doses of > 2.0 Gy to ≤ 3.0 Gy per fraction and 12% received moderate to highly hypofractionated therapy with doses of > 3.0 Gy to 8.0 Gy. Radiation therapy led to a significant improvement of well-being (35% of patients) and reduction of symptoms, especially with regard to pain (66%), dyspnea (61%), and neurological deficits (60%). Therapy was very well tolerated with only 4.5% grade I or II acute toxicities being observed. Unscheduled termination was observed in 19 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative radiation therapy is effective in reducing symptoms, increases subjective well-being, and has minimal side effects. More studies are necessary for subgroup analyses and for clarifying the different goals in palliative radiotherapy.

Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-Mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions.

The objective of this investigation was to determine the diagnostic value of unilateral edema in differentiating benign from malignant breast disease on T2w-TSE images in MR-Mammography (MRM). All patients from a 10-year period undergoing surgery in the same institution after having received MRM in our department were included in this prospective analysis of previous acquired examinations. To eliminate bias caused by prior procedures, all patients having had biopsy, operation, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy before MRM were excluded. T2w-TSE images were acquired after a dynamic contrast-enhanced series of T1-weighted images in a standardized examination protocol (1.5 T). Edema was defined as a high-signal intensity on T2w-TSE images and it was categorized as absent, perifocal, or diffuse. Examinations were rated by two experienced observers blinded to all procedures and results following MRM. In cases of disconcordance, the opinion of a third radiologist decided. Statistical testing included Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact testing. A total of 1,010 patients with a mean age of 55 years (SD: 11.6 years, range: 16-87 years) with 1,129 histologically verified lesions were included in this investigation. After removing all patients with prior procedures from the patient collective, 974 lesions were left for statistical analysis. Perifocal edema was highly significantly (p < 0.001) associated with malignant disease, leading to a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 33.5%, 93.9%, 89.6, and 57.1%, respectively. Unilateral edema in general showed the following diagnostic parameters: sensitivity 53.0%, specificity 80.5%, PPV 80.9%, and NPV 52.3%. Edema seems to be associated with malignancy in the majority of cases. Especially, specificity and PPV were found to be high. These findings may be helpful in diagnostic decisions on otherwise equivocal cases.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study for quantification of infarct size comparing directly serial versus single time-point measurements of cardiac troponin T.

OBJECTIVES: We compared single-point cardiac troponin T (cTnT) measurements with parameters from serial sampling during 96 h after acute myocardial infarction with magnetic resonance imaging measured infarct mass. BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) allows exact quantification of myocardial infarct size. Clinically, measurement of cardiac biomarkers is a more convenient alternative. METHODS: The CE-MRI infarct mass was determined 4 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 31 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 30 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. All single-point, peak, and integrated area under the curve (AUC) cTnT values were plotted against CE-MRI infarct mass. RESULTS: All single-point and serial cTnT values were significantly higher in STEMI than in NSTEMI (p < 0.01) patients. Except for the admission values, all single-point values on any of the first 4 days, peak cTnT and AUC cTnT were found to correlate comparably well with infarct mass. Among single-point measurements, cTnT on day 4 (cTnTD4) showed highest correlation and performed as well as peak cTnT or AUC cTnT (r = 0.66 vs. r = 0.65 vs. r = 0.69). Receiver-operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that cTnTD4 >0.84 microg/l predicted infarct mass above median as well as peak cTnT >1.57 microg/l or AUC cTnT (receiver-operator characteristic for AUC: 0.839 vs. 0.866 vs. 0.893). However, estimation of infarct mass with cTnTD4, peak cTnT, and AUC cTnT was worse in patients with NSTEMI (r = 0.36, r = 0.5, r = 0.36) than in STEMI (r = 0.75 vs. r = 0.65 vs. r = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: All single-point cTnTs, except on admission, give a good estimation of infarct size and perform as well as peak cTnT or AUC cTnT. Infarct estimation by single-point measurements, particularly cTnTD4, may gain clinical acceptance because the measurement is easy and inexpensive.